Governance & accountability
Review policies, ownership, approval routes, oversight and escalation.
Assess AI governance, documentation, data dependencies and control effectiveness against a clearly defined scope and set of criteria.
We review how AI risks are identified, who owns them, how controls are implemented and what evidence supports their effectiveness. Findings are prioritised so leaders can act.
Review policies, ownership, approval routes, oversight and escalation.
Review data dependencies, model records, limitations and monitoring evidence.
Assess agreed controls, document gaps and prioritise remediation.
Scope, evidence requirements and deliverables are agreed before work begins. Each engagement is shaped around your systems, risk exposure and current maturity.
Define the systems, governance areas and controls under review.
Review documentation and test controls within the agreed scope.
Record the evidence, limitations and significance of each finding.
Provide actions, proposed ownership and a clear decision-maker briefing.
Possible scopes include AI governance, generative AI use, vendor governance, data and lineage controls, human oversight and audit readiness. Technical testing is defined separately according to the system and available evidence.
Where Data Angles has designed or implemented the controls being reviewed, that involvement is disclosed. The engagement scope establishes how objectivity is maintained and whether a separate reviewer is required.
No. An assessment reports findings against agreed criteria and available evidence. It is distinct from an accredited certification, statutory audit or regulatory determination.
Discuss your data governance, AI assurance or agentic AI control requirements with Data Angles.